Ives v. Shaw

New York Supreme Court

Ives v. Shaw

31 How. Pr. 54

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 15, 1865

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 31 How. Pr. 54 (Ives v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ives v. Shaw, 31 How. Pr. 54 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1865).

Pincite

Opinion

Müllin, J.

The defendant was not entitled to a bill of particulars. The damages sought to be recovered under the first and second counts of tho complaint, are not matters of account within the meaning of the Code.. Nor is the defendant entitled to a bill under the third count, as that specifies particularly tho items sought to be recovered.

The motion is therefore denied, but without costs.. The plaintiffs to have twenty days further time in which to reply.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Müllin, J.

The defendant was not entitled to a bill of particulars. The damages sought to be recovered under the first and second counts of tho complaint, are not matters of account within the meaning of the Code.. Nor is the defendant entitled to a bill under the third count, as that specifies particularly tho items sought to be recovered.

The motion is therefore denied, but without costs.. The plaintiffs to have twenty days further time in which to reply.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 How. Pr. 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ives-v-shaw-nysupct-1865.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack