Ivar Olsen v. Sverre Puntervold, Sverre Puntervold v. Ivar Olsen

338 F.2d 21
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 1, 1964·No. 21192_1·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ivar Olsen, plaintiff in the district court, appellant here, sought to recover in a diversity action in Florida from the appellee, Sverre Puntervold, on a judgment rendered in a New York Court against a partnership of which the appellee was a member in a case where no service was had on the appellee. The district court correctly held, in dismissing the complaint, that a judgment against a partnership is not binding upon a partner in his individual capacity where rendered in an action without service upon him.

The appellee, Puntervold, filed a. counterclaim for malicious prosecution which the district court dismissed without prejudice. The counterclaim was-premature and the dismissal was proper. 3 Moore’s Federal Practice 36, Par. 13.13 n. 19.

The judgment of the district court is-

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ivar Olsen v. Sverre Puntervold, Sverre Puntervold v. Ivar Olsen, 338 F.2d 21 (5th Cir. 1964).

338 F.2d 21 (Ivar Olsen v. Sverre Puntervold, Sverre Puntervold v. Ivar Olsen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Sohn
971 F. Supp. 488 (D. Oregon, 1997)
Pago Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Ye Ahn Moolsoan, Ltd.
25 Am. Samoa 2d 14 (High Court of American Samoa, 1993)
Nutri-West v. Gibson
764 P.2d 693 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1988)
Quann v. Whitegate-Edgewater
112 F.R.D. 649 (D. Maryland, 1986)
McAllester v. Aldridge (In Re Anderson)
24 B.R. 640 (M.D. Tennessee, 1982)
Hunter v. Milhous
305 N.E.2d 448 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1973)
City of Miami v. EASTERN REALTY COMPANY
202 So. 2d 760 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)