Israel v. Krupa
This text of 180 Misc. 995 (Israel v. Krupa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where a guest in plaintiff’s automobile sues plaintiff and defendants for personal injuries suffered as a result of a collision between two automobiles driven by plaintiff and defendant-respondent, the judgment obtained in her favor against plaintiff and in defendants’ favor may not be set up against plaintiff as res judicata in a subsequent action by plaintiff against defendant-respondent for property damage. (Self v. International Ry. Co., 224 App. Div. 238.) The defendant not having appealed from the dismissal of his counterclaim he may not have a second trial. (Ginsberg v. City of Long Beach, 286 K Y. 400, 403.)
Judgment and order so far as appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event, and motion denied.
Hammer, Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
180 Misc. 995, 43 N.Y.S.2d 113, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/israel-v-krupa-nyappterm-1943.