Israel v. Krupa

180 Misc. 995, 43 N.Y.S.2d 113, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2128
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJune 28, 1943
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 180 Misc. 995 (Israel v. Krupa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Israel v. Krupa, 180 Misc. 995, 43 N.Y.S.2d 113, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2128 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Opinion

Memorandum Per Curiam.

Where a guest in plaintiff’s automobile sues plaintiff and defendants for personal injuries suffered as a result of a collision between two automobiles driven by plaintiff and defendant-respondent, the judgment obtained in her favor against plaintiff and in defendants’ favor may not be set up against plaintiff as res judicata in a subsequent action by plaintiff against defendant-respondent for property damage. (Self v. International Ry. Co., 224 App. Div. 238.) The defendant not having appealed from the dismissal of his counterclaim he may not have a second trial. (Ginsberg v. City of Long Beach, 286 K Y. 400, 403.)

Judgment and order so far as appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event, and motion denied.

Hammer, Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

St. Paul Fire Marine Insurance Co. v. Dowdell
109 So. 2d 151 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1959)
Mickadeit v. Kansas Power and Light Co.
257 P.2d 156 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1953)
Simodejka v. Williams
62 A.2d 17 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 Misc. 995, 43 N.Y.S.2d 113, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/israel-v-krupa-nyappterm-1943.