Israel Nava Arellano v. David R. Rivas

CourtDistrict Court, D. Arizona
DecidedJanuary 8, 2026
Docket2:25-cv-02827
StatusUnknown

This text of Israel Nava Arellano v. David R. Rivas (Israel Nava Arellano v. David R. Rivas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Israel Nava Arellano v. David R. Rivas, (D. Ariz. 2026).

Opinion

1 NH 2 WO 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Israel Nava Arellano, No. CV-25-02827-PHX-JAT (ASB) 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 David R. Rivas, 13 Defendant.

14 15 Self-represented Plaintiff Israel Nava Arellano, who is confined in the San Luis 16 Regional Detention Center, has filed a “Petition to Grant Postage Fees for Court 17 Proceedings,” which the Clerk of Court filed as a prisoner civil rights complaint under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1984 to facilitate the Court’s consideration of it. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff also filed an 19 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2). The Court will construe the Petition 20 as a Motion for Injunctive Relief, deny the Motion and Application to Proceed, and dismiss 21 this case. 22 In his Motion, Plaintiff claims his Petition was returned to him and the officer in 23 charge informed him that her department could not cover the mailing fees to send 24 Plaintiff’s voluminous Petition to the Court. Plaintiff asks the Court to order the Warden 25 of San Luis Regional Detention Center and his officials to “no[t] interrupt or obstruct 26 [Plaintiff’s] court proceedings.” (Doc. 1.) 27 Motions for injunctive relief are not independent actions but, rather, a means to seek 28 extraordinary relief in an ongoing action that has been initiated by filing a complaint or 1 other proper petition that alleges jurisdictional facts. Indeed, Rule 65 of the Federal Rules 2 of Civil Procedure, which provides for the granting of preliminary injunctions and 3 temporary restraining orders, “was designed solely as a procedural tool to expedite the 4 action and accommodate the court and the litigants” and “does not confer either subject 5 matter or personal jurisdiction on the court.” Citizens Concerned for the Separation of 6 Church and State v. City and County of Denver, 628 F.2d 1289, 1299 (10th Cir. 1980). 7 Before seeking injunctive relief, Plaintiff must first have a Complaint pending before the 8 Court. See Stewart v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 762 F.2d 193, 9 198 (2d Cir. 1985) (“Only after an action has been commenced can preliminary injunctive 10 relief be obtained.”); see also Devose v. Herrington, 42 F.3d 470, 471 (8th Cir. 1994) (per 11 curiam) (a party seeking injunctive relief must establish a relationship between the claimed 12 injury and the conduct asserted in the complaint). Because there is no Complaint pending 13 before the Court, Plaintiff’s Motion to Grant Postage Fees for Court Proceedings is not 14 properly before the Court. Accordingly, the Court will deny the Motion and dismiss this 15 case. 16 Plaintiff may file a motion for a preliminary injunction in a new case, so long as 17 Plaintiff first files, in the new case, a signed civil rights complaint on a court-approved 18 form and either pays the filing and administrative fees or files an Application to Proceed 19 In Forma Pauperis. As a courtesy, the Court will direct the Clerk of Court to provide 20 Plaintiff with the court-approved forms for filing a civil rights Complaint and an 21 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. 22 IT IS ORDERED: 23 (1) Plaintiff’s “Petition to Grant Postage Fees for Court Proceedings” (Doc. 1) 24 is denied without prejudice. 25 (2) Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is denied 26 without prejudice. 27 (3) The Clerk of Court must close this case. 28 1 (4) The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner and a court-approved form for filing an Application to 3 | Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees and Costs. 4 Dated this 8th day of January, 2026. 5 6 ' James A. Teilborg 8 Senior United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona

1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form should not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state conviction or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. ' 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence, you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment. 2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4 provides that complaints by incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you may attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard letter-sized paper. You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional or corrected information, which may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to cite law. 3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of a material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury. 4. The Filing and Administrative Fees. The total fees for this action are $405.00 ($350.00 filing fee plus $55.00 administrative fee). If you are unable to immediately pay the fees, you may request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the “Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915” for additional instructions. 5. Original and Judge=s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and of any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court if you wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be identical to the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten. This section does not apply to inmates housed at an Arizona Department of Corrections facility that participates in electronic filing. 6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined when your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined in Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were confined in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott Division. If you were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file in the Tucson Division. Unless you are an inmate housed at an Arizona Department of Corrections facility that participates in electronic filing, mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $405 filing and administrative fees or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to:

1 Revised 11/6/24 Phoenix & Prescott Divisions: OR Tucson Division: U.S. District Court Clerk U.S. District Court Clerk U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130 U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500 401 West Washington Street, SPC 10 405 West Congress Street Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119 Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010

7. Change of Address.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Israel Nava Arellano v. David R. Rivas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/israel-nava-arellano-v-david-r-rivas-azd-2026.