Isley v. Dove

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7766

EDWARD ISLEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DAN L. DOVE, Warden of Federal Correctional Institution at Edgefield; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-4649-8)

Submitted: March 30, 2005 Decided: April 22, 2005

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Isley, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Edward Isley, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000). Isley also appeals the court’s order denying his motion

filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Isley v. Dove, No. CA-01-4649-8

(D.S.C. Dec. 2, 2003; Sept. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -