Isley v. Dove

Fourth Circuit

Isley v. Dove

126 F. App'x 156

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 22, 2005·No. No. 04-7766·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Edward Isley, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). Isley also appeals the court’s order denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Isley v. Dove, No. CA-01-4649-8 (D.S.C. Dec. 2, 2003; Sept. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Edward Isley, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). Isley also appeals the court’s order denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Isley v. Dove, No. CA-01-4649-8 (D.S.C. Dec. 2, 2003; Sept. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Isley v. Dove, 126 F. App'x 156 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

126 F. App'x 156 (Isley v. Dove) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related