Island ADC, Inc. v. Baldassano Architectural Group

49 A.D.3d 815, 854 N.Y.2d 230
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 25, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by50 cases

This text of 49 A.D.3d 815 (Island ADC, Inc. v. Baldassano Architectural Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Island ADC, Inc. v. Baldassano Architectural Group, 49 A.D.3d 815, 854 N.Y.2d 230 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

The plaintiff commenced this action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract. Frior to answering, the defendants moved, inter alia, pursuant to CFLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the complaint as time-barred. The Supreme Court granted that branch of the motion, and we now reverse.

[816]*816On a motion to dismiss a cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) on the ground that it is barred by the statute of limitations, a defendant bears the initial burden of establishing, prima facie, that the time in which to sue has expired (see Sabadie v Burke, 47 AD3d 913 [2008]; Matter of Schwartz, 44 AD3d 779 [2007]). In considering the motion, a court must take the allegations in the complaint as true and resolve all inferences in favor of the plaintiff (see Sabadie v Burke, 47 AD3d 913 [2008]; Matter of Schwartz, 44 AD3d at 779). Here, the defendants argued that the complaint was time-barred because the causes of action accrued on October 10, 1998 when the work performed pursuant to the contract the plaintiff alleged they breached was completed, and the action was not commenced until December 19, 2006, well past the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations of six years (see CPLR 213 [2]; Phillips Constr. Co. v City of New York, 61 NY2d 949, 951 [1984]; Petracca v Petracca, 305 AD2d 566, 567 [2003]). However, the plaintiff alleged that the statute of limitations started running anew in January 2001 when the defendants made a partial payment on the balance due on the contract, and wrote to the plaintiff acknowledging that an additional balance was due and promising to pay the same in monthly installments (see Stern v Stern Metals, Inc., 22 AD3d 567 [2005]). Thus, the Supreme Court erred in granting that branch of the defendants’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the complaint as time-barred. Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Carni, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

L.G. v. S.V.
2026 NY Slip Op 50389(U) (New York Supreme Court, Queens County, 2026)
Lobosco v. City of New York
2025 NY Slip Op 31818(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)
R.M. v. Archdiocese of N.Y.
2025 NY Slip Op 50576(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)
Young v. New York City Tr. Auth.
2025 NY Slip Op 31219(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)
Glowatz v. City of New York
2025 NY Slip Op 31099(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)
Agwanhu v. City of New York
2025 NY Slip Op 30841(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)
Rijos v. New York City Tr. Auth.
2024 NY Slip Op 34467(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Spates v. City of New York
2024 NY Slip Op 33667(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Hammer v. Heller
2024 NY Slip Op 33658(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
ZZ Acupuncture, P.C. v. Kemper Ins. Co.
83 Misc. 3d 136(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Holloway v. City of New York
2024 NY Slip Op 50812(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Sebco Dev., Inc. v. Siegel & Reiner, LLP
2024 NY Slip Op 50292(U) (New York Supreme Court, Bronx County, 2024)
Gaviola v. Lamarre
2024 NY Slip Op 30803(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Hines v. City of New York
2024 NY Slip Op 30781(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Goolsby v. City of New York
2024 NY Slip Op 24068 (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
New Millennium Med. Imaging, P.C. v. GEICO
76 Misc. 3d 31 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Right Aid Med. Supply Corp. v. MVAIC
76 Misc. 3d 128(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Milky Way Acupuncture, P.C. v. MVAIC
75 Misc. 3d 139(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Performance Plus Med., P.C. v. MVAIC
75 Misc. 3d 140(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Collins-Genova v. Louros
167 N.Y.S.3d 100 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 A.D.3d 815, 854 N.Y.2d 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/island-adc-inc-v-baldassano-architectural-group-nyappdiv-2008.