Home/Supreme Court/Isiogu v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.

Isiogu v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.

178 L. Ed. 2d 862, 131 S. Ct. 1062, 562 U.S. 1198, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 1049, 79 U.S.L.W. 3434
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 24, 2011
DocketNo. 10-329
StatusPublished

This text of 178 L. Ed. 2d 862 (Isiogu v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Isiogu v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 178 L. Ed. 2d 862, 131 S. Ct. 1062, 562 U.S. 1198, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 1049, 79 U.S.L.W. 3434 (U.S. 2011).

Opinion

Motion of petitioners to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

Same case below, 597 F.3d 370.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Covad Communications Co.
597 F.3d 370 (Sixth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 L. Ed. 2d 862, 131 S. Ct. 1062, 562 U.S. 1198, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 1049, 79 U.S.L.W. 3434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isiogu-v-michigan-bell-telephone-co-scotus-2011.