Isen Contracting Corp. v. Town of Oyster Bay
279 A.D. 1010, 111 N.Y.S.2d 488, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5646
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 7, 1952·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
While the evidence presented a question of fact as to whether the amendment constituted spot zoning, nevertheless plaintiff offered no evidence warranting a finding that by the enactment of the amendment it had suffered detriment or that there was waste of the funds of the town. (Bowery Sav. Bank v. Plymouth Colony Corp., 254 App. Div. 870.) Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Isen Contracting Corp. v. Town of Oyster Bay, 279 A.D. 1010, 111 N.Y.S.2d 488, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5646 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
279 A.D. 1010 (Isen Contracting Corp. v. Town of Oyster Bay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
De Popas v. Barraud
38 A.D.2d 597 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1971)
Blumberg v. City of Yonkers
205 N.E.2d 686 (New York Court of Appeals, 1965)
Ponemon v. Inc. Village of East Hills
32 Misc. 2d 454 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Thomas v. Town of Bedford
29 Misc. 2d 861 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
Brechner v. INC. VIL. OF LAKE SUCCESS
25 Misc. 2d 920 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1960)
Brechner v. Incorporated Village of Lake Success
23 Misc. 2d 159 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Greenberg v. City of New Rochelle
206 Misc. 28 (New York Supreme Court, 1954)