Home/New York Court of Appeals/Blumberg v. City of Yonkers

Blumberg v. City of Yonkers

205 N.E.2d 686, 15 N.Y.2d 791, 257 N.Y.S.2d 589, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1638
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 4, 1965
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 205 N.E.2d 686 (Blumberg v. City of Yonkers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blumberg v. City of Yonkers, 205 N.E.2d 686, 15 N.Y.2d 791, 257 N.Y.S.2d 589, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1638 (N.Y. 1965).

Opinions

Order affirmed, with costs, upon the memorandum at the Appellate Division.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fixed, and Scileppi. Judges Van Voobhis, Bubke and Bebgan dissent and vote to reverse and to reinstate the judgment of Special Term, Judge Bebgan in an opinion in which Judge Bubke concurs, Judge Van Voobhis in the following memorandum in [793]*793which Judge Burke concurs: I dissent upon the ground that the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance does not constitute spot zoning. It was adopted pursuant to a comprehensive plan to keep automobiles of patrons of large commercial establishments and other organizations off the streets.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Augenblick v. Town of Cortlandt
104 A.D.2d 806 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Anderson v. Krupsak
51 A.D.2d 229 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Liverpool Central School District v. Nyquist
84 Misc. 2d 20 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 N.E.2d 686, 15 N.Y.2d 791, 257 N.Y.S.2d 589, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blumberg-v-city-of-yonkers-ny-1965.