Isaac v. State
29 So. 3d 438, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2917, 2010 WL 785883
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Isaac v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 992 So. 2d 304 →
Opinion
As the issues raised on appeal were not properly preserved for appellate review and/or do not rise to the level of fundamental error, we affirm the defendant’s convictions and sentence. See Simpson v. State, 3 So.3d 1135, 1146 (Fla.2009); [439]*439Suarez v. State, 694 So.2d 161 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Isaac v. State, 29 So. 3d 438, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2917, 2010 WL 785883 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).
29 So. 3d 438 (Isaac v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Simpson v. State
3 So. 3d 1135 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2009)
Suarez v. State
694 So. 2d 161 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)