Isaac v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Isaac v. State

13 So. 3d 519, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 7619, 2009 WL 1675762

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 17, 2009

Docket3D08-2004

StatusPublished

This text of 13 So. 3d 519 (Isaac v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Isaac v. State, 13 So. 3d 519, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 7619, 2009 WL 1675762 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION TO ENFORCE MANDATE

SUAREZ, J.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of Defendant Willie E. Isaac’s Rule 3.850 motion claiming ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Further, the record shows that on January 17, 2008, the trial court on remand from this Court corrected the defendant’s sentence by granting credit for all time served and gain time arising out of the original charges. See Isaac v. State, 971 So.2d 908 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION TO ENFORCE MANDATE

SUAREZ, J.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of Defendant Willie E. Isaac’s Rule 3.850 motion claiming ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Further, the record shows that on January 17, 2008, the trial court on remand from this Court corrected the defendant’s sentence by granting credit for all time served and gain time arising out of the original charges. See Isaac v. State, 971 So.2d 908 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 So. 3d 519, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 7619, 2009 WL 1675762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/isaac-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack