Irwin v. San Francisco Savings Union
136 U.S. 578, 10 S. Ct. 1064, 34 L. Ed. 540, 1890 U.S. LEXIS 2230
Opinion
It is conceded by counsel for plaintiff in error that this case is governed by Wright v. Roseberry, 121 U. S. 488, and the judgment is, therefore, upon the authority of that case,
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Irwin v. San Francisco Savings Union, 136 U.S. 578, 10 S. Ct. 1064, 34 L. Ed. 540, 1890 U.S. LEXIS 2230 (1890).
136 U.S. 578 (Irwin v. San Francisco Savings Union) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stewart v. United States
316 U.S. 354 (Supreme Court, 1942)
United States v. Stewart
121 F.2d 705 (Ninth Circuit, 1941)
Standard Oil Co. of California v. United States
107 F.2d 402 (Ninth Circuit, 1940)
United States v. Stewart
29 F. Supp. 59 (N.D. California, 1939)
O'Donnell v. United States
91 F.2d 14 (Ninth Circuit, 1936)
Work v. United States ex rel. O'Donnell
23 F.2d 136 (D.C. Circuit, 1927)
DeProft v. Heydecker
297 Ill. 541 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1921)
United States v. Thibodeaux
232 F. 91 (Fifth Circuit, 1916)
Beer v. Whiteville Lumber Co.
86 S.E. 1024 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1915)
Russ v. Sims
169 S.W. 69 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1914)