Irwin v. Deyo
7 Cow. 153
This text of 7 Cow. 153 (Irwin v. Deyo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Irwin v. Deyo, 7 Cow. 153 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).
Opinion
Giles v. Caines, 3 Caines, 107, gives countenance to the practice on the part of the defendant. But the rule supposed to be implied by that case, was exploded by Smith v. Wells, (6 John 286.) The party must be governed by the copies delivered. If the other party desire the pleading should be filed, we will compel this to be done at any time nunc pro tunc. The motion must be granted.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Giles v. Caines
3 Cai. Cas. 107 (New York Supreme Court, 1805)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 Cow. 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irwin-v-deyo-nysupct-1827.