Giles v. Caines

3 Cai. Cas. 107, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 463
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1805
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 3 Cai. Cas. 107 (Giles v. Caines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Giles v. Caines, 3 Cai. Cas. 107, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 463 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).

Opinion

Per curiam.

The omission of filing the plea, not being known when issue was joined, or the cause noticed, cannot be cured by those acts. The principle therefore of Shephard ads. Case, applies. Though there is a strong affidavit of merits, we can relieve only on terms; those must be payment of costs, and filing the plea instanter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wolford v. Oakley
43 How. Pr. 118 (Superior Court of Buffalo, 1872)
Irwin v. Deyo
7 Cow. 153 (New York Supreme Court, 1827)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Cai. Cas. 107, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giles-v-caines-nysupct-1805.