Irving v. Home Accident Insurance

137 S.E. 105, 36 Ga. App. 551, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 143
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 5, 1927·No. 17129·Published·Cited by 23 cases

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. Where the owner of timber furnishes a sawmill and employs another person to saw the timber into lumber, and pays him a definite sum per thousand feet for the sawing, which sum is paid in advancements as the lumber is sawed, and where from the money advanced the person so employed pays all the help employed in the work, and the difference between the sum advanced and the expense of operating the sawmill constitutes his profits, and where he has0 exclusive power to control the help and to fix their compensation, and to hire and discharge the help at his discretion, and where he cuts and saws the lumber into merchantable products under specifications given to him from time to time by the owner as the owner receives orders for the lumber, and where he saws the trees into lumber of such dimensions as in his judgment' the trees will make, he is not a servant of the owner, but is an independent contractor. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co. v. Lee, 36 Ga. App. 248 (136 S. E. 173). Where a laborer thus employed by the person operating the sawmill is injured in such a manner as would entitle him to compensation under the workmen’s compensation act, he can not recover compensation from the owner of the sawmill.

2. Upon the hearing of a claim for compensation, filed by a laborer thus employed, against the owner of the sawmill, where it appeared from uncontradicted evidence -that the employment was as above indicated, [552]*552the finding by the industrial commission, that the person operating the sawmill and who employed the claimant was a servant of the owner and an employing foreman, was not authorized by the evidence, and the award of compensation to the claimant was unauthorized by the evidence and contrary to law. The judge of the superior court properly set aside the award.

Decided March 5, 1927. G. Y. Harrell, J. J. Dunham, for plaintiff. Brock, Sparks & Russell, for defendants.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Irving v. Home Accident Insurance, 137 S.E. 105, 36 Ga. App. 551, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 143 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

137 S.E. 105 (Irving v. Home Accident Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Western Electric Co. v. Capes
296 S.E.2d 381 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Harris v. City of Chattanooga, Tenn.
507 F. Supp. 365 (N.D. Georgia, 1980)
Haygood v. Home Transportation Co.
259 S.E.2d 429 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1979)
Oxford v. Tom Huston Peanut Co.
118 S.E.2d 204 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)
Campbell v. Travelers Insurance Co.
112 S.E.2d 311 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)
Weiss v. Kling
101 S.E.2d 178 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Burnett v. King
77 S.E.2d 772 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Alexander-Bland Lumber Co. v. Jenkins
75 S.E.2d 355 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Mauney v. Collins
13 S.E.2d 97 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Banks v. Ellijay Lumber Co.
200 S.E. 480 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Richards v. Marco Realty Co.
194 S.E. 880 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Scott v. Minor
191 S.E. 263 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Bibb Manufacturing Co. v. Martin
185 S.E. 137 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Liberty Lumber Co. v. Silas
175 S.E. 265 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Bentley v. Jones
173 S.E. 737 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Yearwood v. Peabody
164 S.E. 901 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Massee & Felton Lumber Co. v. Macon Cooperage Co.
162 S.E. 396 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Love Lumber Co. v. Thigpen
155 S.E. 77 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Grant
146 S.E. 792 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Poss Bros. v. Haynie
139 S.E. 127 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)