Irvin v. Coleman

District Court, S.D. Georgia·Decided November 30, 2020·No. 5:20-cv-00005·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA WAYCROSS DIVISION

FREDDIE LEWIS IRVIN,

Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 5:20-cv-5

v.

JEFF COLEMAN, et al., in their individual and official capacities,

Defendants.

O RDE R Plaintiff filed this action, asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 10.1 This Court has conducted its frivolity screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and has concluded the following portions of Plaintiff’s Complaint survive frivolity review: Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim for cruel and unusual punishment against Defendants Coleman, Johnson, Glover, Taylor, and Spradley; and Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment failure to intervene claim against Defendants Coleman and Johnson. Therefore, a copy of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, doc. 10, a copy of this Order, and a copy of the undersigned’s Report recommending dismissal of some of Plaintiff’s claims (which is being issued contemporaneously with this Order) shall be served upon Defendants Coleman, Johnson, Glover, Taylor, and Spradly by the United States Marshal

1 Plaintiff initially filed a Complaint on January 13, 2020. Doc. 1. Plaintiff then filed his First Amended Complaint on January 15, 2020. Doc. 3. On March 13, 2020, Plaintiff filed his Second Amended Complaint. Doc. 10. “As a general rule, an amended complaint supersedes and replaces the original complaint unless the amendment specifically refers to or adopts the earlier pleading.” Varnes v. Local 91, Glass Bottle Blowers Ass’n of U.S. & Can., 674 F.2d 1365, 1370 n.6 (11th Cir. 1982). Accordingly, this Court, in conducting its review under § 1915A, will only consider the allegations of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. See Schreane v. Middlebrooks, 522 F. App’x 845, 847 (11th Cir. 2013) (“The district court did not err in considering [pro se prisoner’s] Amended Complaint to supersede his Initial Complaint.”). without prepayment of cost. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff. The Court also provides the following instructions to the parties that will apply to the remainder of this action.

INSTRUCTIONS TO ALL DEFENDANTS IN THIS ACTION Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the undersigned directs that service be effected by the United States Marshal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). In most cases, the marshal will first mail a copy of the complaint to a defendant by first-class mail and request that the defendant waive formal service of summons. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d); Local R. 4.5. A defendant has a duty to avoid unnecessary costs of serving the summons, and any defendant who fails to comply with the request for waiver must bear the costs of personal service unless good cause can be shown for the failure to return the waiver. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). Generally, a defendant who timely returns the waiver is not required to answer the complaint until 60 days after the date that the marshal sent the request for waiver. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(3).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any Defendant in this action is granted leave of court to take the deposition of Plaintiff upon oral examination. Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(a)(2). Defendants are further advised the Court’s standard 140-day discovery period will commence upon the filing of the last answer. Local R. 26.1. Defendants shall ensure all discovery, including Plaintiff’s deposition and any other depositions in the case, is completed within that discovery period. If a Defendant takes the deposition of any other person, Defendants are ordered to comply with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30. As Plaintiff will not likely attend such a deposition, the Defendant taking the deposition must notify Plaintiff of the deposition and advise him that he may serve on that Defendant written questions Plaintiff wishes to propound to the witness, if any. Defendants shall present such questions to the witness in order and word-for-word during the deposition. Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(c). Plaintiff must submit the questions in a sealed envelope within 10 days of the notice of deposition. INSTRUCTIONS TO PLAINTIFF

Plaintiff is charged with the responsibility of immediately informing this Court and defense counsel of any change of address during the pendency of this action. Local R. 11.1. Plaintiff’s failure to notify the Court of a change in his address may result in dismissal of this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of every pleading or other document submitted for consideration by the Court on each Defendant (or, if appearance has been entered by counsel, the Defendant’s attorney). Plaintiff shall include with the original paper to be filed with the Clerk of Court a certificate stating the date on which a true and correct copy of any document was mailed to each Defendant or the Defendant’s counsel. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5. “Every pleading shall contain a caption setting forth the name of the court, the title of the

action, [and] the file number.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a). Plaintiff has the responsibility for pursuing this case. For example, if Plaintiff wishes to obtain facts and information about the case from a Defendant, Plaintiff must initiate discovery. See generally Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37. The discovery period in this case will expire 140 days after the filing of the last answer. Local R. 26.1. Plaintiff does not need the permission of the Court to begin discovery, and Plaintiff should begin discovery promptly and complete it within this time period. Id. Discovery materials should not be filed routinely with the Clerk of Court; exceptions include: when the Court directs filing; when a party needs such materials in connection with a motion or response, and then only to the extent necessary; and when needed for use at trial. Local R. 26.4. Interrogatories are a practical method of discovery for incarcerated persons. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 33. Interrogatories may be served only on a party to the litigation, and, for the purposes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Irvin v. Coleman, (S.D. Ga. 2020).

Irvin v. Coleman (Irvin v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related