Irons v. Carey
506 F.3d 951, 2007 WL 3256594
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 6, 2007·No. 05-15275·Published·Cited by 13 cases
Opinions
Order; Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD.
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny the petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonre-cused active judges in favor of en banc reconsideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35.
The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Irons v. Carey, 506 F.3d 951, 2007 WL 3256594 (9th Cir. 2007).
506 F.3d 951 (Irons v. Carey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Marcia Stein v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.
115 F.4th 1244 (Ninth Circuit, 2024)
Hayward v. Marshall
603 F.3d 546 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
SENTENO v. California
705 F. Supp. 2d 1175 (E.D. California, 2009)
Atkins v. Davison
687 F. Supp. 2d 964 (C.D. California, 2009)
Ledesma v. Marshall
658 F. Supp. 2d 1155 (E.D. California, 2009)
Thomas v. Yates
637 F. Supp. 2d 837 (E.D. California, 2009)
Milot v. Haws
628 F. Supp. 2d 1152 (C.D. California, 2009)
Ekdahl v. Ayers
621 F. Supp. 2d 829 (N.D. California, 2008)
Greenwood v. Ayers
710 F. Supp. 2d 910 (N.D. California, 2008)
Nakashima v. Kane
628 F. Supp. 2d 1093 (N.D. California, 2008)
Irons v. Carey
506 F.3d 951 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)