Irelands Own, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Irelands Own, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

165 A.D.2d 782

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 25, 1990

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 165 A.D.2d 782 (Irelands Own, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Irelands Own, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority, 165 A.D.2d 782 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of respondent New York State Liquor Authority dated June 13, 1989, which suspended petitioner’s liquor license for a period of 15 days and imposed a $1,000 penalty, is unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding, brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of Sup Ct, NY County [Leland De Grasse, J.], entered Oct. 4, 1989), dismissed, without costs and without disbursements. The clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of respondent, dismissing the petition.

It is for the administrative agency to determine the credibility of the witnesses, to weigh the evidence and to draw inferences therefrom. (Irvington Enters. v Duffy, 155 AD2d 335, 336.) Here, the credible evidence consisted of testimony of a police officer, who in response to a radio call, observed the consumption of liquor on the licensed premises more than two hours after the start of prohibited hours of sale. (Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 106 [5].) The inference drawn therefrom has support in the record and thus this court should not disturb the agency’s findings of fact. (Matter of Radigan v O’Connell, 304 NY 396.)

In view of the charge and petitioner’s past record as a violator, the imposition of a monetary penalty and a limited suspension of the premises’ liquor license is completely warranted.

Concur — Ross, J. P., Rosenberger, Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of respondent New York State Liquor Authority dated June 13, 1989, which suspended petitioner’s liquor license for a period of 15 days and imposed a $1,000 penalty, is unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding, brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of Sup Ct, NY County [Leland De Grasse, J.], entered Oct. 4, 1989), dismissed, without costs and without disbursements. The clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of respondent, dismissing the petition.

It is for the administrative agency to determine the credibility of the witnesses, to weigh the evidence and to draw inferences therefrom. (Irvington Enters. v Duffy, 155 AD2d 335, 336.) Here, the credible evidence consisted of testimony of a police officer, who in response to a radio call, observed the consumption of liquor on the licensed premises more than two hours after the start of prohibited hours of sale. (Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 106 [5].) The inference drawn therefrom has support in the record and thus this court should not disturb the agency’s findings of fact. (Matter of Radigan v O’Connell, 304 NY 396.)

In view of the charge and petitioner’s past record as a violator, the imposition of a monetary penalty and a limited suspension of the premises’ liquor license is completely warranted.

Concur — Ross, J. P., Rosenberger, Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

165 A.D.2d 782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irelands-own-inc-v-new-york-state-liquor-authority-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack