Irby v. Smith

93 S.E. 877, 147 Ga. 329, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 174
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 20, 1917
DocketNo. 312
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 93 S.E. 877 (Irby v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Irby v. Smith, 93 S.E. 877, 147 Ga. 329, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 174 (Ga. 1917).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. Where a grantor conveys land with provision that it shall revert to him whenever the grantee ceases for a period of time to use it for specified purposes, and afterwards, the same grantor conveys the land to another grantee unconditionally, and after the death of the grantor the first grante'e ceases to use the land for the period and for the purposes stated in the first grant, the land reverts, not to the heirs of the deceased grantor, but to the second grantee and his • successors in title. Isler v. Griffin, 134 Ga. 196 (67 S. E. 854); Green’s Administrator v. Irvine (Ky.), 66 S. W. 278.

[330]*330No. 312. October 20, 1917. Complaint for land. Before Judge Bell. Fulton superior court. January 23, 1917. James & Bedgood, for plaintiffs. Rosser, Slaton, Phillips & Hopkins, for defendants.

2. Where one buys land of which another than the grantor is in possession, the purchaser is bound to take notice of the claim of the person holding possession; but such possession affords no'basis for heirs at law- of the grantor to set up a claim adverse to the grantee when the person in possession abandons the same.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur except Ffsh, O. J., and Beck, P, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Raney v. Smith
251 S.E.2d 554 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1979)
Georgia, Ashburn, Sylvester & Camilla Railway Co. v. Johnson
174 S.E.2d 895 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1970)
Franks v. Sparks
121 S.E.2d 27 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1961)
Consolidated School District No. 102 v. Walter
66 N.W.2d 881 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1954)
Williams v. Thomas County
65 S.E.2d 412 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)
Tabor v. Gilmer County
53 S.E.2d 915 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)
Evans v. Brown
27 S.E.2d 300 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Hobbs v. Houston
24 S.E.2d 884 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Rustin v. Butler
24 S.E.2d 318 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Cooper v. Davis
163 S.E. 736 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Caruthers v. Leonard
254 S.W. 779 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1923)
Davidson v. Blackwell
108 S.E. 469 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 S.E. 877, 147 Ga. 329, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irby-v-smith-ga-1917.