Iodice v. State
This text of 103 N.E.2d 348 (Iodice v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Loughban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye and Fuld, JJ. Froessel, J., dissents in the following memorandum : I dissent and vote for reversal for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion below (277 App. Div. 647, 654). Moreover, the evidence is uncontradicted that the natural flow of water was substantially increased by waters continuously diverted into the Delta Reservoir during July, August and through September 15, 1945, through the artificial Forestport feeder created and controlled by the State.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 N.E.2d 348, 303 N.Y. 740, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 1136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iodice-v-state-ny-1951.