Destito v. State

1 A.D.2d 753, 147 N.Y.S.2d 228, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3664
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 29, 1955·No. Claim No. 28030·Published

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and facts and claim dismissed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Certain findings of fact disapproved and reversed and new findings made. Memorandum: An examination of the record in the instant case, and re-examination of the record in Iodice v. State of New York (277 App. Div. 647, affd. 303 N. Y. 740) disclose no material different situátion or existing conditions. In our judgment, the decision in the latter case cited, as there stated and found, is decisive of the theories, arguments and conclusions advanced in the instant case. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment of Court of Claims for claimants on a claim for damages to claimants’ property alleged to have been caused by negligent regulation of Delta Dam.) Present—McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ. [207 Misc. 493.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Destito v. State, 1 A.D.2d 753, 147 N.Y.S.2d 228, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3664 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

1 A.D.2d 753 (Destito v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Iodice v. State
103 N.E.2d 348 (New York Court of Appeals, 1951)
Destito v. State
207 Misc. 493 (New York State Court of Claims, 1955)