Destito v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Destito v. State

1 A.D.2d 753, 147 N.Y.S.2d 228, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3664

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 29, 1955

DocketClaim No. 28030

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 753 (Destito v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Destito v. State, 1 A.D.2d 753, 147 N.Y.S.2d 228, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3664 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and facts and claim dismissed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Certain findings of fact disapproved and reversed and new findings made. Memorandum: An examination of the record in the instant case, and re-examination of the record in Iodice v. State of New York (277 App. Div. 647, affd. 303 N. Y. 740) disclose no material different situátion or existing conditions. In our judgment, the decision in the latter case cited, as there stated and found, is decisive of the theories, arguments and conclusions advanced in the instant case. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment of Court of Claims for claimants on a claim for damages to claimants’ property alleged to have been caused by negligent regulation of Delta Dam.) Present—McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ. [207 Misc. 493.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed on the law and facts and claim dismissed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Certain findings of fact disapproved and reversed and new findings made. Memorandum: An examination of the record in the instant case, and re-examination of the record in Iodice v. State of New York (277 App. Div. 647, affd. 303 N. Y. 740) disclose no material different situátion or existing conditions. In our judgment, the decision in the latter case cited, as there stated and found, is decisive of the theories, arguments and conclusions advanced in the instant case. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment of Court of Claims for claimants on a claim for damages to claimants’ property alleged to have been caused by negligent regulation of Delta Dam.) Present—McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ. [207 Misc. 493.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 753, 147 N.Y.S.2d 228, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/destito-v-state-nyappdiv-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack