Ioannou v. New York
371 U.S. 30, 83 S. Ct. 6, 9 L. Ed. 2d 5, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 338
Opinions
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ioannou v. New York, 371 U.S. 30, 83 S. Ct. 6, 9 L. Ed. 2d 5, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 338 (1962).
371 U.S. 30 (Ioannou v. New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sheppard v. River Valley Fitness One, et al.
2002 DNH 020 (D. New Hampshire, 2002)
Bjarsch v. DiFalco
314 F. Supp. 127 (S.D. New York, 1970)
Goldstein v. Cox
299 F. Supp. 1389 (S.D. New York, 1968)
Wolf v. Trenton Trust Co.
246 A.2d 1 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1968)
In Re Estate of Kish
246 A.2d 1 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1968)
In re Estate of Leikind
239 N.E.2d 550 (New York Court of Appeals, 1968)
Struchmanczuk Estate
44 Pa. D. & C.2d 155 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1968)
Estate of Chichernea
424 P.2d 687 (California Supreme Court, 1967)
Siofletea v. State
424 P.2d 687 (California Supreme Court, 1967)
Estate of Larkin
416 P.2d 473 (California Supreme Court, 1966)
In re the Estate of Draganoff
43 Misc. 2d 233 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1964)
Kurz Estate
32 Pa. D. & C.2d 453 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1964)
In re the Estate of Reidl
39 Misc. 2d 805 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1963)
Ioannou v. New York
371 U.S. 30 (Supreme Court, 1962)