IO at Tech Ridge, LP
This text of IO at Tech Ridge, LP (IO at Tech Ridge, LP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
S BANKR is ce Qs |S Bre IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED and DECREED that the “aie ky .- . . below described is SO ORDERED. ac &.
Dated: February 13, 2020. i ee TONY M. DAVIS UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION IN RE: § CASE NO. 17-11540-tmd IO at TECH RIDGE, LP, § Debtor. § CHAPTER 11 AMENDED RULING ON 11 U.S.C§363(f) ISSUE On March 1, 2018, the Debtor moved for approval of the sale of its primary asset, an apartment complex, free and clear of liens [ECF No. 75]. A hearing on the motion was conducted on March 20, 2018. After the hearing, briefing on how the Court should apply 11 US.C. $363(f) to the potential sale was requested. Section 363(f)(3) allows for the sale of property free and clear of interests in the property if “such interest is a lien and the price at which such property is to be sold is greater than the aggregate value of all liens on such property.” Consistent with the In re Terrance Gardens Park Partnership! and In re Boston Generating, LLC? opinions, the Court interprets subsection (f)(3)
‘In re Terrance Gardens Partnership, 96 B.R. 707, 712-13 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 1989). 2 In re Boston Generating, LLC, 440 B.R. 302, 332-33 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2010).
to mean that the sales price “must be equal to or greater than the aggregate value of the liens asserted against it, not their amount.”3 # # #
3 In re Berker Industries Corp., 63 B.R. 474, 476 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1986). But see Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. Knupfer (In re PW, LLC), 391 B.R. 25 (9th Cir. BAP 2008) (interpreting “value” as used in subsection (f)(3) to refer to the total face amount of all the liens on the property); In re Flour City Bagels, LLC, 557 BR. 53, 88 (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. 2016) (same). Because the sale may go forward if any of the subsections of section 363(f) are met, the Court does not reach the subsection (f)(5) issue. 11 U.S.C. § 363(f); GSL of Ill, LLC v. McCaffety Elec. Co. (In re Demany Int’l, LLC), 471 B.R. 510 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2012).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
IO at Tech Ridge, LP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/io-at-tech-ridge-lp-txwb-2020.