International Waste Industries Corp. v. Cape Environmental Management, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

International Waste Industries Corp. v. Cape Environmental Management, Inc.

583 F. App'x 202

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 18, 2014

DocketNo. 14-1035

StatusPublished

This text of 583 F. App'x 202 (International Waste Industries Corp. v. Cape Environmental Management, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

International Waste Industries Corp. v. Cape Environmental Management, Inc., 583 F. App'x 202 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

International Waste Industries, Inc., appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Cape Environmental Management, Inc., in its action in which International Waste alleged claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, quantum meruit, detrimental reliance, and intentional misrepresentation. We have reviewed the record and the briefs filed by the parties, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. International Waste Indus., Inc. v. Cape Envtl. Mgmt. Inc., No. 8:12-cv-03596-AW (D.Md. Dec. 19, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

International Waste Industries, Inc., appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Cape Environmental Management, Inc., in its action in which International Waste alleged claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, quantum meruit, detrimental reliance, and intentional misrepresentation. We have reviewed the record and the briefs filed by the parties, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. International Waste Indus., Inc. v. Cape Envtl. Mgmt. Inc., No. 8:12-cv-03596-AW (D.Md. Dec. 19, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

583 F. App'x 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/international-waste-industries-corp-v-cape-environmental-management-inc-ca4-2014.