International v. Fleming Companies

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedMarch 26, 1999
Docket97-6035
StatusUnpublished

This text of International v. Fleming Companies (International v. Fleming Companies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
International v. Fleming Companies, (10th Cir. 1999).

Opinion

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 26 1999 TENTH CIRCUIT PATRICK FISHER Clerk

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS GENERAL FUND,

Plaintiff-Appellee, Nos. 97-6035, 97-6132 v. (D.C. No. 96-CV-1650) (Western District of Oklahoma) FLEMING COMPANIES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO, ANDERSON, and TACHA, Circuit Judges.

Two questions are presented by this appeal. The first is whether Oklahoma law

restricts the authority to create and implement shareholder rights plans exclusively to the

board of directors. The second is whether shareholders may propose resolutions requiring

that shareholder rights plans be submitted to the shareholders for vote at the succeeding

annual meeting. We certified these questions to the Supreme Court of the State of

* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. Oklahoma, and it responded “no” to the first question and “yes” to the second.

International Brotherhood of Teamsters General Fund v. Fleming Companies, Inc.,

No. 90,185, 1999 WL 35227 (Okla. Jan. 26, 1999). After subsequent briefing in this

court by the parties, we have concluded the issues before us have been resolved by the

response of the Oklahoma Supreme Court, and further proceedings are not required.

The judgment of the district court for the Western District of Oklahoma is

AFFIRMED. Appellee’s motion for attorney fees on appeal is GRANTED, and the

matter is REMANDED for determination of a reasonable amount of fees to be awarded

and for entry of an appropriate judgment on the merits of this case.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

John C. Porfilio Circuit Judge

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
International v. Fleming Companies, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/international-v-fleming-companies-ca10-1999.