International Textbook Co. v. Peterson
This text of 218 U.S. 664 (International Textbook Co. v. Peterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
INTERNATIONAL TEXTBOOK COMPANY
v.
PETERSON.
SAME
v.
LYNCH.
Supreme Court of United States.
Mr. David C. Harrington for plaintiff in error.
No briefs filed for defendants in error.
Per Curiam:
Substantially the same question of Federal law involved in these two cases arose under a Kansas statute in International Textbook Co. v. Pigg, 217 U.S. 91; and the Federal right asserted in that case was sustained. There is no difference in principle between the two cases last named and the Pigg case, although the Federal question involved in them arises under the statutes, respectively, of other States Wisconsin and Vermont. In view of the pleadings and the conceded facts in these cases the judgment in each of them must be reversed on the authority of the Pigg case, and the cases are severally remanded for such further proceedings as is required by and is not inconsistent with this opinion.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
218 U.S. 664, 31 S. Ct. 225, 54 L. Ed. 1201, 1910 U.S. LEXIS 2058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/international-textbook-co-v-peterson-scotus-1910.