International Expediters, Inc. v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 537
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in International Expediters, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 Cust. Ct. 230
United States Customs Court·Decided April 29, 1958·No. No. 61877; protest 217819-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of articles in chief value of metal, suitable for use and used to distribute electrical energy, and that they are not machines for determining the strength of materials or articles in tension, compression, torsion, >or shear, flashlights, batteries, vacuum cleaners, not internal combustion engines, nor parts thereof, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

International Expediters, Inc. v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 537 (cusc 1958).

40 Cust. Ct. 537 (International Expediters, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.