International Expediters, Inc. v. United States

35 Cust. Ct. 222
United States Customs Court·Decided July 28, 1955·No. No. 59235; protest 212690-K (New York)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the items marked “A” on the invoice accompanying entry 785583, referred to as “slingex,” consist of articles composed wholly or in chief value of rattan core or reed of about one-quarter of an inch in diameter, from which the cane, skin, or peel has been removed. Following the principle of the decisions in Steinhardt & Bro. et al. v. United States (9 Ct. Cust. Appls. 62, T. D. 37940) and Calif-Asia Co., Ltd. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 133, C. A. D. 475), it was held that the merchandise is excluded from the provision for articles, wholly or partly manufactured of rattan and that articles, wholly or in chief value of reed, are, in the absence of more specific provision, dutiable under paragraph 412 as manufactures of wood. The claim was, therefore, sustained as to entry 785583. The protest having been abandoned as to entries 797936 and 807228, same was overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

International Expediters, Inc. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 222 (cusc 1955).

35 Cust. Ct. 222 (International Expediters, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Byrnes v. United States
58 Cust. Ct. 448 (U.S. Customs Court, 1967)