International Expediters, Inc. v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 352, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 134
United States Customs Court·Decided February 26, 1953·No. No. 57104; protest 187364-K (New York)·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial an additional collector’s memorandum was received in evidence. In the memorandum the collector conceded that since the transmittal of the protest to the court, the importer had supplied him with the record of outward manifest, which proved to be correct, and that had said information been in his possession at the time of the review of the protest, the drums would have been entitled to free entry under paragraph 1615, supra. In view of the collector’s concession and following Abstracts 47521, 53676, and 53865, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

International Expediters, Inc. v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 352, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 134 (cusc 1953).

30 Cust. Ct. 352 (International Expediters, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts, Reilly & Sons, Inc. v. United States
61 Cust. Ct. 667 (U.S. Customs Court, 1968)
Bertrand Freres, Inc. v. United States
47 Cust. Ct. 155 (U.S. Customs Court, 1961)
J. J. Distributing Co. v. United States
40 Cust. Ct. 27 (U.S. Customs Court, 1958)