International Expediters, Inc. v. United States

29 Cust. Ct. 398, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1612
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in International Expediters, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 30 Cust. Ct. 352
United States Customs Court·Decided November 13, 1952·No. No. 56932; protests 128615-K/1082, etc. (Chicago)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the appraisements of the merchandise and the liquidations of the entries were made in the same manner, under facts and circumstances the same in all material respects, as the appraisement and liquidation in The Gruen Watch Company v. United States (24 Cust. Ct. 101, C. D. 1216). In accordance with stipulation and following the cited authority the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. It was further held that the legal liquidations should be had which would form the basis for protests in which, should they so desire, the importers may litigate any questions presented by such action under section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

International Expediters, Inc. v. United States, 29 Cust. Ct. 398, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1612 (cusc 1952).

29 Cust. Ct. 398 (International Expediters, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gruen Watch Co. v. United States
24 Cust. Ct. 101 (U.S. Customs Court, 1950)