International Chemical Workers Union Local No. 189 v. Purex Corporation
566 F.2d 48, 96 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3371, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 5732
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided December 7, 1977·No. 77-1402·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
This appeal presents a single, tightly-drawn issue: Is a party to a collective bargaining agreement bound by an arbitrator’s interpretation of a clause in an identically-worded prior contract although that interpretation was dictum? We hold that the prior interpretation does not bind the parties, and affirm on the basis of the district court’s opinion reported at 427 F.Supp. 338 (D.Neb.1977).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
International Chemical Workers Union Local No. 189 v. Purex Corporation, 566 F.2d 48, 96 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3371, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 5732 (8th Cir. 1977).
566 F.2d 48 (International Chemical Workers Union Local No. 189 v. Purex Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tower Rock Stone Co. v. Quarry & Allied Workers Local No. 830
918 F. Supp. 2d 902 (E.D. Missouri, 2013)
Trailways Lines, Inc. v. Trailways, Inc. Joint Council
807 F.2d 1416 (Eighth Circuit, 1986)
AUTO., PETRO. & ALLIED IND. EMP. v. Gelco Corp.
581 F. Supp. 1155 (E.D. Missouri, 1984)
Little Six Corporation v. United Mine Workers of America, Local Union No. 8332
701 F.2d 26 (Fourth Circuit, 1983)
Little Six Corp. v. United Mine Workers, Local Union No. 8332
537 F. Supp. 216 (W.D. Virginia, 1982)
Pittsburgh Metro Area Postal Workers Union v. United States Postal Service
463 F. Supp. 54 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1978)