Interlake Steamship Co. v. City of Toledo
89 F.2d 1010, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3690
Opinion
The decree below is affirmed for the reasons given in the memorandum opinion of the District Judge and upon the 'authority of the cases therein cited, including Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. Duluth S. S. Co., 252 F. 544 (C.C.A.8), certiorari denied 248 U.S. 575, 39 S.Ct. 12, 63 L.Ed. 428. Cf. The Gloria, 286 F. 188 (D.C.N.Y.); U. S. v. National City Bank, 83 F.(2d) 236, 238, 106 A.L.R. 1235 (C.C.A.2) ; U. S. v. The Thekla, 266 U.S. 328, 340, 45 S.Ct. 112, 69 L.Ed. 313.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Interlake Steamship Co. v. City of Toledo, 89 F.2d 1010, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3690 (6th Cir. 1937).
89 F.2d 1010 (Interlake Steamship Co. v. City of Toledo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Norwegian Barque Thekla
266 U.S. 328 (Supreme Court, 1924)
United States v. National City Bank of New York
83 F.2d 236 (Second Circuit, 1936)
Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Duluth S. S. Co.
252 F. 544 (Eighth Circuit, 1918)
Kingdom of Norway v. Federal Sugar Refining Co.
286 F. 188 (S.D. New York, 1923)