INTERFOOD, INC. v. Rice

337 S.W.3d 731, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 328, 2011 WL 899729
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 15, 2011
DocketED 94427
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 337 S.W.3d 731 (INTERFOOD, INC. v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
INTERFOOD, INC. v. Rice, 337 S.W.3d 731, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 328, 2011 WL 899729 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry Rice, Michael Husmann, and DF Ingredients, Inc., appeal from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a motion to enforce settlement filed by Interfood, Inc., Waltepco Holding Company, Waltepco Realestate, Inc., and F.C.G.M. Van Stip-donk. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rice v. Interfood, Inc.
E.D. Missouri, 2020

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
337 S.W.3d 731, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 328, 2011 WL 899729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interfood-inc-v-rice-moctapp-2011.