INTERFOOD, INC. v. Rice

337 S.W.3d 731, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 328, 2011 WL 899729
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 15, 2011·No. ED 94427·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry Rice, Michael Husmann, and DF Ingredients, Inc., appeal from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a motion to enforce settlement filed by Interfood, Inc., Waltepco Holding Company, Waltepco Realestate, Inc., and F.C.G.M. Van Stip-donk. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

INTERFOOD, INC. v. Rice, 337 S.W.3d 731, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 328, 2011 WL 899729 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

337 S.W.3d 731 (INTERFOOD, INC. v. Rice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rice v. Interfood, Inc.
E.D. Missouri, 2020