INTERFOOD, INC. v. Rice

284 S.W.3d 689, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 396, 2009 WL 764875
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 24, 2009
DocketED 91006
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 284 S.W.3d 689 (INTERFOOD, INC. v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
INTERFOOD, INC. v. Rice, 284 S.W.3d 689, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 396, 2009 WL 764875 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry Rice appeals from the judgment of the trial court declaring that the actions taken by Rice and Husmann in August 2006 regarding the board of directors of Waltepco are null and void, and that the shareholder action by Tepco of November 16, 2007, that removed Rice and Husmann as directors and officers of Waltepco and its subsidiaries was valid and effective.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rice v. Interfood, Inc.
E.D. Missouri, 2020

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
284 S.W.3d 689, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 396, 2009 WL 764875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interfood-inc-v-rice-moctapp-2009.