Interest of Way

319 So. 2d 651
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 29, 1975
Docket48656
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 319 So. 2d 651 (Interest of Way) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Interest of Way, 319 So. 2d 651 (Mich. 1975).

Opinion

319 So.2d 651 (1975)

In the Interest of Henry Charles William WAY, a minor.

No. 48656.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

September 29, 1975.

*652 George S. Monroe, II, Newton, for appellant.

A.F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Ben H. Walley and Karen Gilfoy, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before RODGERS, SUGG and BROOM, JJ.

BROOM, Justice.

At issue is the validity of an order of the Youth Court of Newton County adjudicating Way to be a delinquent and placing him on parole. Subsequently his parole was revoked. This case is not legally distinguishable from In Interest of Ferguson, A Minor, Miss., 317 So.2d 899, rendered on August 25, 1975, which requires reversal.

I.

It is clear in the record that when the original petition was heard, charging Way with delinquency, there was a failure on the part of the state and the court to advise the "minor and his parents" of their right to counsel as required by In Interest of Long, 184 So.2d 861 (Miss. 1966). The same rule or requirement was restated in In Interest of Edwin Ferguson, a Minor, supra. In that case it was said that "both the minors and their parents" should be advised of their right to counsel. See also, In Re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 41, 87 S.Ct. 1428, 1451, 18 L.Ed.2d 527, 554 (1967).

II.

At the hearing of the original petition, according to the state's brief, no evidence was presented except the oral confession given by Way himself. Since no corpus delicti was established, the confession was erroneously admitted. Ferguson, supra; In Interest of Earles, 294 So.2d 171 (Miss. 1974).

Reversed and rendered.

GILLESPIE, C.J., and PATTERSON, INZER, SMITH, ROBERTSON and WALKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Interest of TLC
566 So. 2d 691 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1990)
In Interest of IG
467 So. 2d 920 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
319 So. 2d 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interest-of-way-miss-1975.