Interest of T.A.G.
This text of 2015 ND 256 (Interest of T.A.G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 10/29/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2015 ND 256
In the Interest of T.A.G.
Julie Lawyer, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
T.A.G., Respondent and Appellant
No. 20140445
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Gail Hagerty, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Pamela A. Nesvig, Assistant State’s Attorney, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, ND 58501, for petitioner and appellee.
James D. Sandsmark, 921 Second Avenue South, Fargo, ND 58103, for respondent and appellant.
Interest of T.A.G.
[¶1] T.A.G. appealed from a district court order denying his petition for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. T.A.G. argues the district court erred in finding clear and convincing evidence supporting his continued commitment. We conclude the district court’s findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
John T. Paulson, S.J.
[¶3] The Honorable John T. Paulson, S.J., sitting in place of Sandstrom, J., disqualified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2015 ND 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interest-of-tag-nd-2015.