Interest of D.M.W.

2019 ND 8

• Court: North Dakota Supreme Court
• Decided: January 15, 2019
• Docket: 20180413
• Status: Published

Opinion

Filed 1/15/19 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2019 ND 8

In the Interest of D.M.W., a child

Jacqueline A. Gaddie, Assistant State’s Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee

v.

D.M.W., a child, J.L.M. a/k/a J.L.C., mother, Respondents

and

D.J.W., father, Respondent and Appellant

No. 20180413

Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable John A. Thelen, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Jacqueline A. Gaddie, Assistant State’s Attorney, Grand Forks, ND, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.

Kyle A. Markwardt, Grand Forks, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief. Interest of D.M.W. No. 20180413

Per Curiam. [¶1] D.W. appeals from a juvenile court order terminating his parental rights to D.M.W. On appeal, D.W. argues there was not clear and convincing evidence to support termination of his parental rights because the petitioner failed to prove deprivation is likely to continue, the juvenile court improperly found D.W. abandoned D.M.W, and the juvenile court erred by finding reasonable efforts were made to reunify the family. The juvenile court terminated parental rights based on several findings, including finding D.M.W. is subjected to aggravated circumstances under N.D.C.C. § 27-20-02(3)(f)(2) due to the length of D.W.’s incarceration. We conclude the juvenile court’s finding D.M.W. is subjected to aggravated circumstances is supported by clear and convincing evidence, is not clearly erroneous, and independently supports the termination of D.W.’s parental rights. In Interest of Z.B., 2018 ND 6, ¶ 1, 905 N.W.2d 561 (“Any one of these three findings provides adequate and independent grounds for termination.”). A finding of aggravated circumstances negates the requirement for reasonable efforts of reunification. N.D.C.C. § 27-20- 32.2(4)(a) (“Reasonable efforts . . . are not required if . . . a parent has subjected a child to aggravated circumstances.”). Because the juvenile court’s finding relating to aggravating circumstances is not clearly erroneous, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Jon J. Jensen