C.H. v. C.H. (In Re C.H.)

2019 ND 61, 924 N.W.2d 125
North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided March 13, 2019·No. 20190018; 20190019; 20190020; 20190021·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

*126 [¶1] M.H. appeals from a juvenile court judgment terminating his parental rights to his four children. On appeal, M.H. argues the juvenile court erred by finding the children to be deprived and that the causes of the deprivation were likely to continue, causing harm to the children. The juvenile court terminated parental rights based on several findings, including finding the children were subjected to aggravated circumstances under N.D.C.C. § 27-20-02(3)(b) and (h), due to M.H.'s failure to address substance abuse issues and the children's exposure to methamphetamine. We conclude the juvenile court's finding of aggravated circumstances is supported by clear and convincing evidence, is not clearly erroneous, and supports the termination of M.H.'s parental rights. See Interest of D.M.W ., 2019 ND 8 , ¶ 1, 921 N.W.2d 426 (exposure to aggravated circumstances is an adequate ground for termination of parental rights). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jon J. Jensen

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C.H. v. C.H. (In Re C.H.), 2019 ND 61, 924 N.W.2d 125 (N.D. 2019).

2019 ND 61 (C.H. v. C.H. (In Re C.H.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Interest of C.H.
2019 ND 61 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2019)