Interbartolo v. La Femina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Interbartolo v. La Femina

285 A.D. 962, 139 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6310

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 14, 1955

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 285 A.D. 962 (Interbartolo v. La Femina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Interbartolo v. La Femina, 285 A.D. 962, 139 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6310 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action between adjoining property owners, brought by one to enjoin a trespass by the other, plaintiff appeals from a final judgment, entered upon a [963]*963stipulation of settlement, requiring the parties to execute certain grants of easement and respondent to pay appellant a specified sum of money, and from a resettled judgment. The notices of appeal bring up for review the order directing the entry of judgment pursuant to the aforesaid stipulation, and a decision denying appellant’s motion to set aside the aforesaid stipulation. Resettled judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Appeal from original judgment dismissed, without costs. The original judgment has been superseded by the resettled judgment, from which appeal has been taken. (Safrin v. Friedman Hat Co., 276 App. Div. 853; Eletto v. Ziperstein, 275 App. Div. 946.) Appeal from decision dismissed, without costs. No appeal lies from a decision. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Ughetta, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action between adjoining property owners, brought by one to enjoin a trespass by the other, plaintiff appeals from a final judgment, entered upon a [963]*963stipulation of settlement, requiring the parties to execute certain grants of easement and respondent to pay appellant a specified sum of money, and from a resettled judgment. The notices of appeal bring up for review the order directing the entry of judgment pursuant to the aforesaid stipulation, and a decision denying appellant’s motion to set aside the aforesaid stipulation. Resettled judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Appeal from original judgment dismissed, without costs. The original judgment has been superseded by the resettled judgment, from which appeal has been taken. (Safrin v. Friedman Hat Co., 276 App. Div. 853; Eletto v. Ziperstein, 275 App. Div. 946.) Appeal from decision dismissed, without costs. No appeal lies from a decision. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Ughetta, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 A.D. 962, 139 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interbartolo-v-la-femina-nyappdiv-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack