Insurance Co. of North America v. Gish, Brook & Co.
This text of 1909 OK 107 (Insurance Co. of North America v. Gish, Brook & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a proceeding in error from a judgment of the district court of Caddo county in an action in which M. N. Gish, T. H. Brook, and G. W. Baker, a partnership, doing business under the firm name and style of Gish, Brook & Co., were plaintiffs, and plaintiff in error was defendant. Defendants in error have filed in this proceeding a motion to dismiss upon the same grounds as was presented in the motion to dismiss in the action of Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance Company v. Gish, Brook & Co. (decided at this term of court), ante, p. 830, 102 Pae. 708. The same propositions are presented by the motion to dismiss in this case as were presented in that case, and determined by the court therein, and it is unnecessary to discuss the same here. The reasoning of the court upon the motion in that case and the conclusion reached must follow in this case, 'and the motion to dismiss be sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1909 OK 107, 102 P. 713, 23 Okla. 836, 1909 Okla. LEXIS 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/insurance-co-of-north-america-v-gish-brook-co-okla-1909.