Innerarity v. Byrne
46 U.S. 295, 12 L. Ed. 159, 5 How. 295, 1847 U.S. LEXIS 324
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court, saying, that the citation was not necessarily a part of the record, it forming no part of the proceedings of the court below. The presumption is, that one was issued when the writ of error was allowed, and it may be proved aliimde.
Motion overruled, and case continued to next term.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Innerarity v. Byrne, 46 U.S. 295, 12 L. Ed. 159, 5 How. 295, 1847 U.S. LEXIS 324 (1847).
46 U.S. 295 (Innerarity v. Byrne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Peaslee v. Peaslee
17 N.E. 506 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1888)
Hudgins v. Kemp, Assignee, &C.
59 U.S. 530 (Supreme Court, 1856)
Cook v. MOFFAT
46 U.S. 295 (Supreme Court, 1847)