Innerarity v. Byrne
46 U.S. 295, 12 L. Ed. 159, 5 How. 295, 1847 U.S. LEXIS 324
This text of 46 U.S. 295 (Innerarity v. Byrne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Innerarity v. Byrne, 46 U.S. 295, 12 L. Ed. 159, 5 How. 295, 1847 U.S. LEXIS 324 (1847).
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court, saying, that the citation was not necessarily a part of the record, it forming no part of the proceedings of the court below. The presumption is, that one was issued when the writ of error was allowed, and it may be proved aliimde.
Motion overruled, and case continued to next term.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Peaslee v. Peaslee
17 N.E. 506 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1888)
Hudgins v. Kemp, Assignee, &C.
59 U.S. 530 (Supreme Court, 1856)
Cook v. MOFFAT
46 U.S. 295 (Supreme Court, 1847)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
46 U.S. 295, 12 L. Ed. 159, 5 How. 295, 1847 U.S. LEXIS 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/innerarity-v-byrne-scotus-1847.