Inhabitants of the First Parish in Sutton v. Cole

8 Mass. 96
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided September 15, 1811·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The question brought before us in this action is whether Gibbs Sibley is, upon the facts shown, an inhabitant of the first parish in the town of Sutton. And we are decidedly of opinion that he is not. The congregational society, created by the statute of 1794, is to every intent *a parish. The persons named in the act, together with their estates, are set off from the rest of the inhabitants and territory of the town, and erected into a corporation well known in this commonwealth by the name of a poll parish. In the language of the declaration of rights prefixed to the constitution, and of our laws, the terms parish and religious society have the same meaning and effect. Let the demandants be called.

Demandants nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Inhabitants of the First Parish in Sutton v. Cole, 8 Mass. 96 (Mass. 1811).

8 Mass. 96 (Inhabitants of the First Parish in Sutton v. Cole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hale v. Everett
53 N.H. 9 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1868)
Town of New Market v. Smart
45 N.H. 87 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1863)
First Parish in Boothbay v. Wylie
43 Me. 387 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1857)
Johnson v. McLaughlin
9 Ala. 551 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1846)
Inhabitants of the First Parish in Winthrop v. Inhabitants of Winthrop
1 Me. 208 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1821)
Jewett v. Burroughs
15 Mass. 463 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1819)
Inhabitants of Brewer v. Inhabitants of New Gloucester
14 Mass. 216 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1817)