Ingram v. Stephens

134 S. Ct. 367, 187 L. Ed. 2d 2, 571 U.S. 801, 82 U.S.L.W. 3177, 2013 WL 5507300, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5390
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 7, 2013·No. No. 12–9877.·Published

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of McQuiggin v. Perkins, --- U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 1924, 185 L.Ed.2d 1019 (2013).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ingram v. Stephens, 134 S. Ct. 367, 187 L. Ed. 2d 2, 571 U.S. 801, 82 U.S.L.W. 3177, 2013 WL 5507300, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5390 (U.S. 2013).

134 S. Ct. 367 (Ingram v. Stephens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McQuiggin v. Perkins
133 S. Ct. 1924 (Supreme Court, 2013)