Ingram v. Stephens

Supreme Court

Ingram v. Stephens

134 S. Ct. 367, 187 L. Ed. 2d 2, 571 U.S. 801, 82 U.S.L.W. 3177, 2013 WL 5507300, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5390

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 7, 2013

DocketNo. 12–9877.

StatusPublished

This text of 134 S. Ct. 367 (Ingram v. Stephens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ingram v. Stephens, 134 S. Ct. 367, 187 L. Ed. 2d 2, 571 U.S. 801, 82 U.S.L.W. 3177, 2013 WL 5507300, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5390 (U.S. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of McQuiggin v. Perkins, --- U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 1924, 185 L.Ed.2d 1019 (2013).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of McQuiggin v. Perkins, --- U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 1924, 185 L.Ed.2d 1019 (2013).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 S. Ct. 367, 187 L. Ed. 2d 2, 571 U.S. 801, 82 U.S.L.W. 3177, 2013 WL 5507300, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingram-v-stephens-scotus-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack