Ingram v. State
130 S.E. 222, 34 Ga. App. 505, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 353
Opinion
1. Under the authority of Walker v. State, 118 Ga. 757 (2) (45 S. E. 608), the court did not err in failing to charge on the law of alibi.
2. The accused was not harmed by a charge on a lesser offense than that for which he was convicted.
3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and-is approved by the trial judge.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ingram v. State, 130 S.E. 222, 34 Ga. App. 505, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 353 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).
130 S.E. 222 (Ingram v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Heatley v. State
147 S.E. 784 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)