Ingram v. State

130 S.E. 222, 34 Ga. App. 505, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 353
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 10, 1925·No. 16666·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. Under the authority of Walker v. State, 118 Ga. 757 (2) (45 S. E. 608), the court did not err in failing to charge on the law of alibi.

2. The accused was not harmed by a charge on a lesser offense than that for which he was convicted.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and-is approved by the trial judge.

Judgment affirmed.

,Broyles, G. J., and Bloodioorih, J., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ingram v. State, 130 S.E. 222, 34 Ga. App. 505, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 353 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

130 S.E. 222 (Ingram v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heatley v. State
147 S.E. 784 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)