Ingram v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

Opinion

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Theresa Ingram, Case No. 2:24-cv-02253-CDS-BNW

Plaintiff Order Adopting Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and Closing Case v.

Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, [ECF No. 7] et al., Defendants

United States Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler issued a report and recommendation (R&R) that the complaint in this action be dismissed without leave to amend after screening the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. R&R, ECF No. 7. Judge Weksler determined that Ingram failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted because her claims allege violations of various federal and state criminal statutes which did not give rise to private rights of civil action. Id. at 2–3. Ingram had until December 31, 2024, to lodge any objections to the R&R. See id. at 4; see also LR IB 3-2(a) (stating that parties wishing to object to an R&R must file objections within fourteen days); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) (same). As of the date of this order, Ingram has not objected to the recommendation, nor has she requested more time to do so. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.” Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Because no objection has been filed, I adopt the R&R in full and dismiss the complaint without leave to amend.

Conclusion IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [ECF No. 7] is adopted in its entirety. This action is dismissed without leave to amend. The Clerk of Court is kindly directed to enter judgment accordingly and to close this case. Dated: January 6, 2024 J, / Ly — Cristina D. va d States District Judge

ll