Ingram v. Bearden, Sheriff

47 S.E.2d 833, 212 S.C. 399, 1948 S.C. LEXIS 58
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided April 26, 1948·No. 16069·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinions

FishburnE, J.:

For the reasons well stated in the order' appealed from, all exceptions are overruled and the order is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Let it be reported.

StukES and OxnER, JJ., concur. Baker, C.J., and Tayror, ]., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ingram v. Bearden, Sheriff, 47 S.E.2d 833, 212 S.C. 399, 1948 S.C. LEXIS 58 (S.C. 1948).

47 S.E.2d 833 (Ingram v. Bearden, Sheriff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. One Coin-Operated Video Game MacHine
467 S.E.2d 443 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1996)
State v. Four Video Slot MacHines
453 S.E.2d 896 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1995)
State v. Wassick
191 S.E.2d 283 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1972)
State v. DeAngelis
183 S.E.2d 906 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1971)
State v. Pinball MacHines
404 P.2d 923 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1965)
State v. Langley
115 S.E.2d 308 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1960)
State Ex Rel. Replogle v. Joyland Club
220 P.2d 988 (Montana Supreme Court, 1950)
Holliday v. Governor of State of South Carolina
78 F. Supp. 918 (W.D. South Carolina, 1948)
Ringstaff v. Evans
47 S.E.2d 838 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1948)