Ingraham v. Wright

425 U.S. 990, 96 S. Ct. 2200
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ingraham v. Wright. Read the opinion of the Court — 430 U.S. 651
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 24, 1976·No. No. 75-6527·Published

Opinion

C. A. 5th Cir. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to Questions 1 and 2, presented by the petition, which read as follows:

1. “Does the infliction of severe corporal punishment [991]*991upon public school students, absent notice of the charges for which punishment is to be inflicted and an opportunity to be heard, violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?”

2. “Does the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the Eighth Amendment apply to the administration of discipline through severe corporal punishment inflicted by public school teachers and administrators upon public school children?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ingraham v. Wright, 425 U.S. 990, 96 S. Ct. 2200 (1976).

425 U.S. 990 (Ingraham v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.