Ingraham v. Wright

425 U.S. 990, 96 S. Ct. 2200
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 24, 1976
DocketNo. 75-6527
StatusPublished

This text of 425 U.S. 990 (Ingraham v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ingraham v. Wright, 425 U.S. 990, 96 S. Ct. 2200 (1976).

Opinion

C. A. 5th Cir. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to Questions 1 and 2, presented by the petition, which read as follows:

1. “Does the infliction of severe corporal punishment [991]*991upon public school students, absent notice of the charges for which punishment is to be inflicted and an opportunity to be heard, violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?”

2. “Does the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the Eighth Amendment apply to the administration of discipline through severe corporal punishment inflicted by public school teachers and administrators upon public school children?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
425 U.S. 990, 96 S. Ct. 2200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingraham-v-wright-scotus-1976.